To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
In light of the Farrer by-election result, I think the Nationals’ hold on this seat is under serious threat from One Nation. One Nation already polled 13.65% in Parkes in 2025, the sixth highest in Australia. One Nation 3CP in Parkes (24.3%) was the third highest in Australia. I don’t think the first-term National MP for Parkes will have enough personal votes to withstand a One Nation surge. Parkes defintely will be a big One Nation target at the 2028 election.
I agree that this seat is one where ON seriously threaten the Nats. However it is a seat where there is a very high likelihood that Labor and the Greens will end up third. Depending on how high the ON primary is, the Nats should theoretically be saved by Labor and Green preferences. However, in places like Broken Hill that preference flow might not be assured.
Labor coming third on a 3CP – their primary vote is very low now – could be the difference in Parkes, New England, Maranoa, Farrer possibly also O’Donoghue (Grey) and a few others.
It could be possible that rural or working class Labor voters either switch to One Nation or preference One Nation ahead of the Nationals with the aim of defeating the Nationals. Labor voters, particularly in Broken Hill, may feel empowered to defeat the Nationals in a safe seat, knowing that Labor would never win it. One Nation could just be their protest option.
There was also a strong SFF and minor right wing vote that could get behind One Nation.
According to Redbridge’s May MRP polling, the highest ONP primary vote and 2CP is in Parkes. It is higher in Parkes than in Farrer, New England or anywhere in QLD. I’m not sure if Parkes will be ONP’s best result but I agree that it is under serious threat.
It has the traits of many other rural seats with a high ONP vote. They include:
Towns and outposts with decreasing population and disappearing high streets, especially west of the Newell Highway.
High reliance on mining and agriculture.
Low percentage of people who hold degrees.
Small migrant population.
Prime ON territory. The local state MP was originally elected as a Shooter so a lot of voters here peeled off the major parties a while back. The Nats might survive if Labor fall to third. At this stage, a seat the Nats should be deeply worried about.
Parkes is a good example of regional grievance. Political competitiveness is a good way to address that grievance and get things done. The problem in these regional seats is that they are becoming competitive but the dominant political player in the nation – the ALP – is not in the game and can just go on ignoring these areas as there are no votes – even Senate votes – to be won there.